RUS  ENG
Full version
JOURNALS // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Prikladnaya Matematika. Informatika. Protsessy Upravleniya // Archive

Vestnik S.-Petersburg Univ. Ser. 10. Prikl. Mat. Inform. Prots. Upr., 2019 Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 518–528 (Mi vspui425)

This article is cited in 2 papers

Computer science

Comparative analysis of calculation methods in electron spectroscopy

T. A. Andreevaa, M. E. Bedrinaa, D. A. Ovsyannikovb

a St. Petersburg State University, 7-9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
b St. Petersburg State University of industrial technologies and design, 18, Bolshaya Morskaya ul., St. Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation

Abstract: The possibilities of the electron density functional method DFT with hybrid functionals B3LYP and M06-HF with various basis sets for calculating the electronic spectra of molecules were analyzed. It was shown that the specific form of the basis sets 6-31G, cc-PVDZ, 6-311 $++$ G ** are not significantly influence on the value of the long-wave transition band in the electronic absorption spectrum of 3,6-diamino-N-methyl phthalimide. The choice of the hybrid potential in the method of the non-stationary theory of the TD-DFT density functional and especially using CIS configuration interaction scheme leads to noticeable differences in the calculated values of the ($\pi-\pi*$)-transition band. For all other transitions, the changes were not so significant. The electronic spectra of ten compounds — substituted phthalimide were calculated by different methods using the 6-31G basis set. The structure of a substance uniquely determines the spectrum pattern. Comparing results of calculations of these compounds by the TD-DFT method and the CIS method, which includes single-excited states, we concluded that the best agreement with the experiment is observed using the CIS method and the 6-31G basis set.

Keywords: density functional theory, basis functions, TD-DFT, CIS, electronic spectra, phthalimides.

UDC: 539.194

MSC: 81Q05

Received: September 9, 2019
Accepted: November 7, 2019

DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu10.2019.408



© Steklov Math. Inst. of RAS, 2024